Health-Related Social Needs

Utility Shutoff Threat by County — US Rankings

CDC PLACES 2023 · Age-adjusted prevalence · All 3,144 US counties

Utility services threat captures adults whose gas, electricity, oil, or water service was threatened or shut off in the past 12 months. It is one of the sharpest indicators of acute household financial stress that PLACES tracks — by the time a utility shutoff notice is issued, a household has typically been months behind. The measure correlates closely with the housing-insecurity, food-insecurity, and transportation-barrier rankings. PLACES estimates have wider confidence intervals here than for the chronic-disease measures.

How this ranking is built

Source: CDC PLACES 2023 release. Methodology: BRFSS survey responses pooled across years, fitted with a small-area statistical model, age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. Confidence intervals (95%) are shown for each county — wider intervals indicate more uncertainty in the modeled estimate, typically driven by smaller populations.

Lowest Utility Services Threat / Shutoff Rates — Top 100 Counties

Counties with the lowest reported utility services threat / shutoff prevalence — these counties show the most favorable position on this measure.

#CountyRate
1Falls Church city3.7%
2Ozaukee County4.1%
3Waukesha County4.2%
4Arlington County4.3%
5Forsyth County4.4%
6Loudoun County4.4%
7Carver County4.5%
8St. Croix County4.5%
9Oconee County4.6%
10Washington County4.6%
11Santa Clara County4.7%
12Hunterdon County4.7%
13Summit County4.7%
14San Mateo County4.8%
15Washington County4.8%
16Los Alamos County4.8%
17Dane County4.8%
18Hamilton County4.9%
19Morris County4.9%
20Morgan County4.9%
21Calumet County4.9%
22Marin County5.0%
23Dallas County5.0%
24Delaware County5.0%
25Fairfax County5.0%
26San Francisco County5.1%
27Poquoson city5.1%
28Door County5.1%
29Outagamie County5.1%
30Monroe County5.2%
31Scott County5.2%
32Albemarle County5.2%
33Iowa County5.2%
34Dodge County5.3%
35Wright County5.3%
36Rockingham County5.3%
37Somerset County5.3%
38Burleigh County5.3%
39Wasatch County5.3%
40Green County5.3%
41Pierce County5.3%
42Placer County5.4%
43Warren County5.4%
44Washington County5.4%
45Burke County5.4%
46Cass County5.4%
47Oliver County5.4%
48Fairfax city5.4%
49Goochland County5.4%
50Eau Claire County5.4%
51Marathon County5.4%
52Pepin County5.4%
53Olmsted County5.5%
54Gallatin County5.5%
55Sarpy County5.5%
56Dare County5.5%
57Cavalier County5.5%
58Davis County5.5%
59Columbia County5.5%
60Jefferson County5.5%
61Kewaunee County5.5%
62La Crosse County5.5%
63Oneida County5.5%
64Polk County5.5%
65DuPage County5.6%
66Boone County5.6%
67Madison County5.6%
68Howard County5.6%
69Middlesex County5.6%
70Chisago County5.6%
71Dakota County5.6%
72Houston County5.6%
73Sherburne County5.6%
74Saunders County5.6%
75Traill County5.6%
76Bristol County5.6%
77Clarke County5.6%
78Hanover County5.6%
79York County5.6%
80Florence County5.6%
81Portage County5.6%
82Sheboygan County5.6%
83Walworth County5.6%
84El Dorado County5.7%
85Ada County5.7%
86Grundy County5.7%
87Marion County5.7%
88Carroll County5.7%
89Wabasha County5.7%
90Kearney County5.7%
91Bergen County5.7%
92Monmouth County5.7%
93Sussex County5.7%
94Saratoga County5.7%
95Winnebago County5.7%
96Bremer County5.8%
97Dickinson County5.8%
98Mills County5.8%
99Winneshiek County5.8%
100Johnson County5.8%

Best 100 counties for Utility Services Threat / Shutoff.

Highest Utility Services Threat / Shutoff Rates — Bottom 100 CountiesCounties with the highest reported utility services threat / shutoff prevalence.
#CountyRate
1East Carroll Parish27.8%
2Madison Parish25.5%
3Greene County25.5%
4McKinley County25.0%
5Kusilvak Census Area24.9%
6Humphreys County24.8%
7Holmes County24.8%
8Bullock County24.1%
9Perry County24.0%
10Tunica County23.8%
11Claiborne Parish23.3%
12Sioux County23.2%
13Sharkey County23.1%
14Quitman County23.0%
15Claiborne County22.9%
16Phillips County22.8%
17Jefferson County22.5%
18Coahoma County22.5%
19Lowndes County22.5%
20Tensas Parish22.3%
21Randolph County22.2%
22Wilcox County22.0%
23Desha County21.7%
24Leflore County21.5%
25Lee County20.7%
26Morehouse Parish20.6%
27Washington County20.4%
28Hancock County20.4%
29Dallas County20.4%
30Bienville Parish20.3%
31Macon County20.1%
32Noxubee County20.0%
33Sunflower County19.9%
34St. Francis County19.9%
35Apache County19.9%
36Sumter County19.8%
37McDowell County19.7%
38Bethel Census Area19.6%
39Allendale County19.5%
40Concordia Parish19.5%
41Chicot County19.2%
42St. Helena Parish19.1%
43Terrell County19.1%
44Yazoo County18.9%
45Wilkinson County18.9%
46Bolivar County18.9%
47Dougherty County18.9%
48Marion County18.8%
49Dillon County18.8%
50Macon County18.6%
51Issaquena County18.5%
52Red River Parish18.5%
53Luna County18.4%
54Marlboro County18.3%
55Lafayette County18.2%
56Crittenden County18.2%
57Glacier County18.1%
58Webster Parish18.1%
59Jefferson County18.1%
60Jefferson Davis County18.0%
61St. Landry Parish18.0%
62Lee County17.9%
63Pemiscot County17.7%
64Clayton County17.7%
65Conecuh County17.7%
66Telfair County17.6%
67Stewart County17.6%
68Petersburg city17.5%
69Tallahatchie County17.5%
70Northwest Arctic Borough17.5%
71Robeson County17.4%
72Mingo County17.3%
73Adair County17.3%
74Halifax County17.3%
75San Juan County17.3%
76Baker County17.3%
77Nome Census Area17.3%
78Bronx County17.2%
79Big Horn County17.2%
80Clay County17.2%
81Emporia city17.1%
82Adams County17.1%
83Avoyelles Parish17.1%
84Calhoun County17.1%
85Barnwell County17.0%
86Quitman County17.0%
87Danville city16.9%
88Williamsburg County16.9%
89Hale County16.9%
90Scotland County16.8%
91Pike County16.8%
92Clay County16.8%
93Franklin Parish16.8%
94Jenkins County16.8%
95Crisp County16.8%
96Barbour County16.7%
97Hopewell city16.6%
98Washington County16.6%
99Cibola County16.6%
100Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area16.6%

Worst 100 counties for Utility Services Threat / Shutoff.

What this ranking suggests

Utility shutoff threats are the social-driver measure most predictive of acute healthcare-system strain — emergency-department use, medication non-adherence, and pediatric hospitalization all rise when households face these pressures. Counties at the top of this ranking are typically also stressed across other social-driver rankings; the four together describe a household financial-distress profile.

Methodology notes & limitations

Estimates are statistical model outputs, not direct measurements. Small counties have wider confidence intervals; treat narrow rank differences in those rows as within-noise. Counties where the underlying population is too small to support modeling are suppressed entirely (about 1% of US counties). All measures are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. The PLACES dataset uses BRFSS self-reported data — self-report introduces known direction-of-bias in some measures (BMI is under-reported; binge drinking is under-reported), but the bias is roughly uniform across counties so ranking comparability is preserved. See the methodology page for full data-pipeline documentation.

By Logan Johnson, Founder & Data EditorPublished Reviewed by Logan Johnson, Founder & Data Editor

Data source: CDC PLACES 2023 release. Measure ID: SHUTUTILITY.

← All rankings